On Fri, Nov 09 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:34 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> > Looking at diff.c:parse_diff_opt() and enable_patch_output(), rather
>> > than introducing this new conditional, I'm thinking that a
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:34 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > Looking at diff.c:parse_diff_opt() and enable_patch_output(), rather
> > than introducing this new conditional, I'm thinking that a more
> > correct fix would be:
> >
> >
On Thu, Nov 08 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:22 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>> In 73a834e9e2 ("range-diff: relieve callers of low-level configuration
>> burden", 2018-07-22) we broke passing down options like --no-patch,
>> --stat etc. Fix that regression, and
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:22 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> In 73a834e9e2 ("range-diff: relieve callers of low-level configuration
> burden", 2018-07-22) we broke passing down options like --no-patch,
> --stat etc. Fix that regression, and add a test for some of these
> options being passed
In 73a834e9e2 ("range-diff: relieve callers of low-level configuration
burden", 2018-07-22) we broke passing down options like --no-patch,
--stat etc. Fix that regression, and add a test for some of these
options being passed down.
As noted in a change leading up to this ("range-diff doc: add a
5 matches
Mail list logo
