On 02/13, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:57:34PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I think your patch is actually fixing that case. But your search
> > is only part of the story. You found somebody using "-m" explicitly, but
> > what about somebody blindly calling:
> >
> > git
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:57:34PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> Yeah, I think your patch is actually fixing that case. But your search
> is only part of the story. You found somebody using "-m" explicitly, but
> what about somebody blindly calling:
>
> git stash create $*
>
> That's now
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 02:51:27PM +, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> > How do we tell the difference between new-style invocations, and
> > old-style ones that look new-style? IOW, I think:
> >
> > git stash create -m works
> >
> > currently treats "-m works" as the full message, and it would
On 02/06, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:26:41PM +, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > git stash create currently supports a positional argument for adding a
> > message. This is not quite in line with how git commands usually take
> > comments (using a -m flag).
> >
> > Add a new
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:26:41PM +, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> git stash create currently supports a positional argument for adding a
> message. This is not quite in line with how git commands usually take
> comments (using a -m flag).
>
> Add a new syntax for adding a message to git stash
git stash create currently supports a positional argument for adding a
message. This is not quite in line with how git commands usually take
comments (using a -m flag).
Add a new syntax for adding a message to git stash create using a -m
flag. This is with the goal of deprecating the old style
6 matches
Mail list logo
