Duy Nguyen writes:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>>
>>> We need this later to avoid double locking a worktree, or unlocking one
>>> when it's not even locked.
>>
>> Shouldn't
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
>> We need this later to avoid double locking a worktree, or unlocking one
>> when it's not even locked.
>
> Shouldn't this be done lazily?
>
> If a user is working in
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> We need this later to avoid double locking a worktree, or unlocking one
> when it's not even locked.
Shouldn't this be done lazily?
If a user is working in worktree B and is not doing anything funky,
she would not care why worktree A and C are
We need this later to avoid double locking a worktree, or unlocking one
when it's not even locked.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
worktree.c | 12
worktree.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
index
4 matches
Mail list logo