On 1/23/2019 5:13 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Maybe add a fsck at the end for sanity's sake. Also, I think that
preservation of .keep packfiles is an important feature, and maybe worth
a test.
Good points! I forgot to test the .keep stuff directly here because I
have an equivalent test in VFS for Gi
> From: Derrick Stolee
>
> The 'git multi-pack-index expire' command looks at the existing
> mult-pack-index, counts the number of objects referenced in each
> pack-file, deletes the pack-fils with no referenced objects, and
> rewrites the multi-pack-index to no longer reference those packs.
Tha
SZEDER Gábor writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:21:16AM -0800, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
> wrote:
>> The 'git multi-pack-index expire' command ...
>
> The subject line could use a s/verb/subcommand/.
Yeah, that probably is more in line with the existing terminology
for other Git command
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:21:16AM -0800, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> The 'git multi-pack-index expire' command ...
The subject line could use a s/verb/subcommand/.
From: Derrick Stolee
The 'git multi-pack-index expire' command looks at the existing
mult-pack-index, counts the number of objects referenced in each
pack-file, deletes the pack-fils with no referenced objects, and
rewrites the multi-pack-index to no longer reference those packs.
Refactor the wr
5 matches
Mail list logo
