Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] stash: support pathspec argument

2017-02-12 Thread Thomas Gummerer
On 02/12, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > Thanks Peff and Junio for the review of the last round. > Sorry it seems like I messed up the In-Reply-To header. Previous rounds were at: v1: http://public-inbox.org/git/20170121200804.19009-1-t.gumme...@gmail.com/ v2: http://public-inbox.org/git/2017012920160

[PATCH v4 0/7] stash: support pathspec argument

2017-02-12 Thread Thomas Gummerer
Thanks Peff and Junio for the review of the last round. Changes since v3: - Instead of using ${1-...} to check for missing arguments and dying show the usage for stash instead, being more consistent with how the rest of stash behaves - Let push_stash handle the --help argument from save_stash