Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: >> pu does not build for me: >> >> 2017-05-30T11:38:50.0089681Z libgit.a(grep.o): In function `pcre1match': >>

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Ævar, > > On Mon, 29 May 2017, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > >> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Schindelin >> wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, 27 May 2017, René Scharfe

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

Hi Ævar, On Mon, 29 May 2017, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 27 May 2017, René Scharfe wrote: > >> Am 26.05.2017 um 05:15 schrieb Liam Beguin: > >> > I tried to time the execution on an

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi René, > > On Sat, 27 May 2017, René Scharfe wrote: > >> Am 26.05.2017 um 05:15 schrieb Liam Beguin: >> > I tried to time the execution on an interactive rebase (on Linux) but >> > I did not notice a

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

Hi Liam, On Thu, 25 May 2017, Liam Beguin wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > This patch series reimplements the expensive pre- and post-processing of > > the todo script in C. > > > > [...] I see that you used git-send-email to send this. It did look a bit

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

Hi René, On Sat, 27 May 2017, René Scharfe wrote: > Am 26.05.2017 um 05:15 schrieb Liam Beguin: > > I tried to time the execution on an interactive rebase (on Linux) but > > I did not notice a significant change in speed. > > Do we have a way to measure performance / speed changes between

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

Johannes Schindelin writes: > This patch series reimplements the expensive pre- and post-processing of > the todo script in C. > > And it concludes the work I did to accelerate rebase -i. > I took another look at the series (as "What's cooking" report was listing

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

Am 26.05.2017 um 05:15 schrieb Liam Beguin: I tried to time the execution on an interactive rebase (on Linux) but I did not notice a significant change in speed. Do we have a way to measure performance / speed changes between version? Well, there's performance test script

[PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

Hi Johannes, Johannes Schindelin writes: > This patch series reimplements the expensive pre- and post-processing of > the todo script in C. > > And it concludes the work I did to accelerate rebase -i. > > Changes since v3: > > - removed the no-longer-used

[PATCH v4 00/10] The final building block for a faster rebase -i

This patch series reimplements the expensive pre- and post-processing of the todo script in C. And it concludes the work I did to accelerate rebase -i. Changes since v3: - removed the no-longer-used transform_todo_ids shell function - simplified transform_todo_ids()'s command parsing - fixed