From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not exactly sure I understand the point of not squashing all those
patches together ?
It's not like one is going without the others, or that the commit
message provides some new information (except for
Christian Couder wrote:
Now ends_with() returns 1 when the suffix is present and 0 otherwise.
Sounds good.
[...]
And in vcs-svn/fast_export.c there was already an ends_with()
function that did the same thing. Let's used the renamed one
while at it.
Yes, despite the change in signature this
From: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com
Christian Couder wrote:
And in vcs-svn/fast_export.c there was already an ends_with()
function that did the same thing. Let's used the renamed one
while at it.
Yes, despite the change in signature this shouldn't slow anything
down. Thanks.
For
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Christian Couder
chrisc...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
To avoid spamming the list again, I am going to send the following
patches from the 86 patch long series to replace prefixcmp() with
starts_with():
[PATCH v2 00/86] replace prefixcmp() with starts_with()
[PATCH
Now ends_with() returns 1 when the suffix is present and 0 otherwise.
The old name followed the pattern anything-cmp(), which suggests
a general comparison function suitable for e.g. sorting objects.
But this was not the case for suffixcmp().
Some popular programming languages have functions or
5 matches
Mail list logo
