On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
entry_count is used in update_one() for two purposes:
1. to skip through the number of processed entries in in-memory index
2. to record the number of entries this
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
wrote:
Nicely explained. I wonder if we can also add a piece of test to
the patch 4/4 to demonstrate the issue with CE_REMOVE entries,
though.
A hand crafted one, maybe. I did
entry_count is used in update_one() for two purposes:
1. to skip through the number of processed entries in in-memory index
2. to record the number of entries this cache-tree covers on disk
Unfortunately when CE_REMOVE is present these numbers are not the same
because CE_REMOVE entries are
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes:
entry_count is used in update_one() for two purposes:
1. to skip through the number of processed entries in in-memory index
2. to record the number of entries this cache-tree covers on disk
Unfortunately when CE_REMOVE is present these numbers
4 matches
Mail list logo