On 8/13/2018 12:25 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 6:05 PM Ben Peart wrote:
I was part way through writing a patch that would copy the valid parts
of the cache-tree from the source index to the dest index
Yeah sorry about that. I make bad judgements all the time,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 6:05 PM Ben Peart wrote:
> I was part way through writing a patch that would copy the valid parts
> of the cache-tree from the source index to the dest index
Yeah sorry about that. I make bad judgements all the time, unfortunately.
If it's sort of working though, please
On 8/13/2018 11:48 AM, Elijah Newren wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:16 AM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
We do n-way merge by walking the source index and n trees at the same
time and add merge results to a new temporary index called o->result.
The merge result for any given path could be
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:48 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:16 AM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
> >
> > We do n-way merge by walking the source index and n trees at the same
> > time and add merge results to a new temporary index called o->result.
> > The merge result for
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:16 AM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
> We do n-way merge by walking the source index and n trees at the same
> time and add merge results to a new temporary index called o->result.
> The merge result for any given path could be either
>
> - keep_entry(): same old index
We do n-way merge by walking the source index and n trees at the same
time and add merge results to a new temporary index called o->result.
The merge result for any given path could be either
- keep_entry(): same old index entry in o->src_index is reused
- merged_entry(): either a new entry is
6 matches
Mail list logo
