On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 08:11:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > So considering "--depth" as a space-saving measure for --aggressive does
> > not seem that effective. But it feels weird to quietly drop actions
> > people might have done with previous aggressive runs.
>
Jeff King writes:
> So considering "--depth" as a space-saving measure for --aggressive does
> not seem that effective. But it feels weird to quietly drop actions
> people might have done with previous aggressive runs.
That argument cuts both ways, doesn't it?
If the user explicitly asks to use
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:20:30AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Here it is. It ended up needing a few preparatory patches.
>
> [1/4]: provide an initializer for "struct object_info"
> [2/4]: sha1_file: make packed_object_info public
> [3/4]: pack-objects: break delta cycles before delta-search
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:57:51AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > One thing to be careful of is that there are more things this
> > drop_reused_delta() should be doing. But I looked through the rest of
> > check_object() and could not find anything else.
>
> Argh, I spoke too soon.
>
> It is true t
4 matches
Mail list logo
