Am 30.11.2012 04:27, schrieb W. Trevor King:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:11:20PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
But I really don't want to figure out how to handle submodule
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:11:20PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
> >> For that reason, I don't like the --pull switch since it implies a
> >> fetch, but I will not always want to do a
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
>> > [snip initial thoughts leading to the update --remote v5]
>>
>> I was thinking the same thing, but reading this who
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > [snip initial thoughts leading to the update --remote v5]
>
> I was thinking the same thing, but reading this whole thread a couple of
> weeks late. Thanks for noticing.
>
>
From: "W. Trevor King"
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:53:34AM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> I thought of a better idea on the train. How about adding `--remote`
> to `submodule update` that overrides the gitlinked SHA-1 with the
> SHA-1 for origin/$branch? All of the other checkout/merge/rebase
>
5 matches
Mail list logo