Thanks for Junio's reviews and suggestions.
This version contains the following changes since v5:
- Fix a decl-after-statement in patch 3/4.
- Improve testcases to cover more scenarios and make them more portable and
readable.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
Xiaolong Ye (4):
patch-ids: make commit_pat
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
> Thanks for Junio's reviews and suggestions.
>
> This version contains the following changes since v5:
>
> - Fix a decl-after-statement in patch 3/4.
>
> - Improve testcases to cover more scenarios and make them more portable and
>readabl
Stefan Beller writes:
> git checkout origin/master
> # toy around, do stuff
> git checkout -b new-shiny-feature
> git format-patch origin-master..
>
> Now I have set the format.useautobase option and then the `git format-patch`
> fails with
>
> fatal: Failed to get upstream, i
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> git checkout origin/master
>> # toy around, do stuff
>> git checkout -b new-shiny-feature
>> git format-patch origin-master..
>>
>> Now I have set the format.useautobase option and then the `git f
Stefan Beller writes:
> I can totally do that for longer series which require some back and forth.
>
> But one-offs, such as typo fixes or other small things[1], for which I do
> even have a local branch (i.e. checkout origin/master && fix &&
> commit && send-email) this is another step that pote
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> I can totally do that for longer series which require some back and forth.
>>
>> But one-offs, such as typo fixes or other small things[1], for which I do
>> even have a local branch (i.e. checkout origin/master
Stefan Beller writes:
>> So from where are you proposing Git to grab that information if you
>> do not tell it? "If the HEAD is detached, assume that the base is
>> where it was detached from" or something?
>
> That would also work for me. In my first mail I was proposing to take
> the informati
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I think the way for you to indicate that desire expected by this
>> series is to use "git branch" to set upstream of new-shiny-feature
>> branch to origin/master. Shouldn't that wo
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:58:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>Stefan Beller writes:
>
>>> So from where are you proposing Git to grab that information if you
>>> do not tell it? "If the HEAD is detached, assume that the base is
>>> where it was detached from" or something?
>>
>> That would als
Ye Xiaolong writes:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:58:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>>Let's hear from folks at Intel ;-) Both of the above sounds like
>>sensible enhancements to me.
>
> Shall I squash these enhancements in this series, or I need to make
> another patch for them?
The update b
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ye Xiaolong writes:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:58:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>>Let's hear from folks at Intel ;-) Both of the above sounds like
>>>sensible enhancements to me.
>>
>> Shall I squash these enhancements in this
11 matches
Mail list logo