On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Karthik Nayak writes:
>
>> Thanks, will add it in.
>
> OK, here is a reroll of what I sent earlier in
>
>
> http://public-inbox.org/git/
>
>
Karthik Nayak writes:
> Thanks, will add it in.
OK, here is a reroll of what I sent earlier in
http://public-inbox.org/git/
but rebased so that it can happen as a preparatory bugfix before
your series.
The bug
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Karthik Nayak writes:
>
>> This is part of unification of the commands 'git tag -l, git branch -l
>> and git for-each-ref'. This ports over branch.c to use ref-filter's
>> printing options.
>>
>>
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Something like this needs to go before that step.
This time with a log message and an additional test. The second
paragraph of the proposed log message is written expecting that this
patch will come before your "branch: use ref-filter printing APIs",
Karthik Nayak writes:
> This is part of unification of the commands 'git tag -l, git branch -l
> and git for-each-ref'. This ports over branch.c to use ref-filter's
> printing options.
>
> Karthik Nayak (17):
> ref-filter: implement %(if), %(then), and %(else) atoms
>
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> This is part of unification of the commands 'git tag -l, git branch -l
>> and git for-each-ref'. This ports over branch.c to use
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> This is part of unification of the commands 'git tag -l, git branch -l
> and git for-each-ref'. This ports over branch.c to use ref-filter's
> printing options.
>
> Initially posted here: $(gmane/279226). It was
This is part of unification of the commands 'git tag -l, git branch -l
and git for-each-ref'. This ports over branch.c to use ref-filter's
printing options.
Initially posted here: $(gmane/279226). It was decided that this series
would follow up after refactoring ref-filter parsing mechanism,
8 matches
Mail list logo