Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>>
>> On 28.11.2012, at 23:23, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>>> They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
>>>
>>> Currently the first ref is handled properly, but not the rest:
>>>
>>> % git
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> On 28.11.2012, at 23:23, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
>>
>> Currently the first ref is handled properly, but not the rest:
>>
>> % git fast-export master ^uninteresting ^fo
On 28.11.2012, at 23:23, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
>
> Currently the first ref is handled properly, but not the rest:
>
> % git fast-export master ^uninteresting ^foo ^bar
All these refs are assumed to point to the same o
They have been marked as UNINTERESTING for a reason, lets respect that.
Currently the first ref is handled properly, but not the rest:
% git fast-export master ^uninteresting ^foo ^bar
reset refs/heads/bar
from :0
reset refs/heads/foo
from :0
reset refs/heads/uninteresting
from :0
4 matches
Mail list logo