On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> Coverity points out that this is a leak (xgetcwd returns an allocated
>> buffer).
>
> I saw that quite recently and was wondering why it reported it this
> late. It has been in 'master' for more than a month.
Because the repo/script f
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:58:00AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
>> index 6dd..369c207 100644
>> --- a/builtin/update-index.c
>> +++ b/builtin/update-index.c
>> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int test_if_untrac
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:58:00AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
>> index 6dd..369c207 100644
>> --- a/builtin/update-index.c
>> +++ b/builtin/update-index.c
>> @@ -130,7 +130
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:58:00AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
> index 6dd..369c207 100644
> --- a/builtin/update-index.c
> +++ b/builtin/update-index.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int test_if_untracked_cache_is_supported(void)
Attempting to flip the untracked-cache feature on for a random index
file with
cd /random/unrelated/place
git --git-dir=/somewhere/else/.git update-index --untracked-cache
would not work as you might expect. Because flipping the feature on
in the index also records the location of the cor
5 matches
Mail list logo