> On 27 Feb 2018, at 06:17, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Lars Schneider
> wrote:
>>> On 25 Feb 2018, at 04:41, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>>> Is this interpretation correct? When I read [1], I
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Lars Schneider
wrote:
>> On 25 Feb 2018, at 04:41, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> Is this interpretation correct? When I read [1], I interpret it as
>> saying that no BOM _of any sort_ should be present when the
> On 25 Feb 2018, at 04:41, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:27 AM, wrote:
>> Whenever a data stream is declared to be UTF-16BE, UTF-16LE, UTF-32BE
>> or UTF-32LE a BOM must not be used [1]. The function returns true if
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:27 AM, wrote:
> Whenever a data stream is declared to be UTF-16BE, UTF-16LE, UTF-32BE
> or UTF-32LE a BOM must not be used [1]. The function returns true if
> this is the case.
>
> [1] http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom10
>
>
From: Lars Schneider
Whenever a data stream is declared to be UTF-16BE, UTF-16LE, UTF-32BE
or UTF-32LE a BOM must not be used [1]. The function returns true if
this is the case.
This function is used in a subsequent commit.
[1]
5 matches
Mail list logo