Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] bisect: add the terms old/new

2015-06-26 Thread Matthieu Moy
Christian Couder christian.cou...@gmail.com writes: So perhaps you could use a function like: write_bisect_terms() { if test ! -s $GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS then echo $NAME_BAD $GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS echo $NAME_GOOD $GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS fi } I

[PATCH v9 4/5] bisect: add the terms old/new

2015-06-25 Thread Matthieu Moy
From: Antoine Delaite antoine.dela...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr When not looking for a regression during a bisect but for a fix or a change in another given property, it can be confusing to use 'good' and 'bad'. This patch introduce `git bisect new` and `git bisect old` as an alternative to 'bad'

Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] bisect: add the terms old/new

2015-06-25 Thread Christian Couder
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Matthieu Moy matthieu@imag.fr wrote: [...] @@ -178,7 +183,7 @@ bisect_start() { } git rev-parse --sq-quote $@ $GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES eval $eval true - if test $revision_seen -eq 1 test ! -s $GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS +