On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
yeah that's the goal. Though as we're in one transaction, as soon
as we have an early exit, the
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
I do not see the problem in the code itself, but rather in understanding
the code. I will send a follow up patch which makes it easier to follow
by removing the early exit with no problem away.
Taken as a whole the code may function correctly but the
By closing the file descriptors after creating the lock file we are not
limiting the size of the transaction by the number of available file
descriptors.
When closing the file descriptors early, we also need to write the values
in early, if we don't want to reopen the files.
Signed-off-by:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
By closing the file descriptors after creating the lock file we are not
limiting the size of the transaction by the number of available file
descriptors.
When closing the file descriptors early, we also need to write the values
in early, if we don't
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
By closing the file descriptors after creating the lock file we are not
limiting the size of the transaction by the number of available file
descriptors.
When closing the file
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
yeah that's the goal. Though as we're in one transaction, as soon
as we have an early exit, the transaction will abort.
An early exit I am talking about is this:
static int
6 matches
Mail list logo
