Stefan Beller writes:
> * renamed return_value_fn to task_finished_fn
It made interdiff noisier but I think it gives us a good end result.
> * the main loop of the parallel processing was first adapted to Junios
> suggestion,
> but Jonathan pointed out more improvements. We can get rid of
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>>
>> - if (!pp->get_next_task(pp->data,
>> + if (!pp->get_next_task(&pp->children[i].data,
>> &pp->children[i].process,
>> -&pp->children[i].err))
>> +
Hi Stefan,
On 01/10/15 02:54, Stefan Beller wrote:
[snip]
While skimming the interdiff for this series, ...
> diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
> index df84985..28048a7 100644
> --- a/run-command.c
> +++ b/run-command.c
> @@ -863,12 +863,13 @@ struct parallel_processes {
>
> get
This replaces sb/submodule-parallel-fetch once again.
Changes are only in patch 5,6,7
(5: reverse popping, 6: see below, 7: adapt to changes of 6).
Junio wrote:
> > + if (pp->return_value(pp->data, &pp->children[i].process,
> > + &pp->children[i].err, c
4 matches
Mail list logo