[Patch v3 0/8] Create single PDF for all HTML files

2012-10-16 Thread Thomas Ackermann
Hi, this is v3 of my patch series for creating a single PDF for all git documentation files. There are only 2 changes since v2 (thanks to Junio for pointing me at these issues) : - The over-long lines in git-bisect-lk2009.txt where shortened by abbreviating the SHA1s. - Pretty-printing the shel

Re: [Patch v3 0/8] Create single PDF for all HTML files

2012-10-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Ackermann writes: > this is v3 of my patch series for creating a single PDF for all > git documentation files. > > There are only 2 changes since v2 (thanks to Junio for pointing me at these > issues) : > - The over-long lines in git-bisect-lk2009.txt where shortened by > abbreviating th

Aw: Re: [Patch v3 0/8] Create single PDF for all HTML files

2012-10-17 Thread Thomas Ackermann
- Original Nachricht Von: Junio C Hamano An: Thomas Ackermann Datum: 17.10.2012 00:11 Betreff: Re: [Patch v3 0/8] Create single PDF for all HTML files > > I (and other people who wrote documentation, I suspect, as well) > feel somewhat offended by the word "

Re: Aw: Re: [Patch v3 0/8] Create single PDF for all HTML files

2012-10-17 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Ackermann writes: > BTW1: As only the changes in the doc files where cherry-picked, currently on > pu howto-index.sh > will create invalid links in howto-index.html because it scans all .txt-files > in ./howto for > 'Content-type: text/asciidoc' and if found, creates a reference to a ht

Aw: Re: Aw: Re: [Patch v3 0/8] Create single PDF for all HTML files

2012-10-18 Thread Thomas Ackermann
> > That means that for the patch [6/8], which adds content-type to the > text files, to be complete, it needs to update Makefile to produce > html files from them. > IMHO also for the new files in ./technical html should be created because now as we have asciidoc markup why not also use it. >

Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: [Patch v3 0/8] Create single PDF for all HTML files

2012-10-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Ackermann writes: > Yes; in e2399e9 the following hunks where left out from the patch to > update-hook-example.txt: > > @@ -111,12 +114,12 @@ then > >info "Found matching head pattern: '$head_pattern'" >for user_pattern in $user_patterns; do > - info "Checking user: