On September 17, 2018 6:02 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Randall S. Becker wrote:
> > On September 17, 2018 3:28 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Randall S. Becker wrote:
>
> >>> Does anyone know whether it is practical to rework git-lfs under a
> >>> language other than "go"? GCC is not even close
On September 17, 2018 6:01 PM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 05:55:55PM -0400, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> > On September 17, 2018 3:28 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Randall S. Becker wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does anyone know whether it is practical to rework git-lfs under a
> > > >
(+cc: Taylor Blau, git-lfs expert)
Randall S. Becker wrote:
> On September 17, 2018 3:28 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Randall S. Becker wrote:
>>> Does anyone know whether it is practical to rework git-lfs under a
>>> language other than "go"? GCC is not even close to being possible to
>>> port
Hi Randall,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 05:55:55PM -0400, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> On September 17, 2018 3:28 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Randall S. Becker wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know whether it is practical to rework git-lfs under a
> > > language other than "go"? GCC is not even close to
On September 17, 2018 3:28 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Randall S. Becker wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know whether it is practical to rework git-lfs under a
> > language other than "go"? GCC is not even close to being possible to
> > port to my NonStop platform (may have tried, some have died - joke
Hi,
Randall S. Becker wrote:
> Does anyone know whether it is practical to rework git-lfs under a language
> other than "go"? GCC is not even close to being possible to port to my
> NonStop platform (may have tried, some have died - joke - trying). I would
> like to convert this directly to C
Hi All,
Does anyone know whether it is practical to rework git-lfs under a language
other than "go"? GCC is not even close to being possible to port to my
NonStop platform (may have tried, some have died - joke - trying). I would
like to convert this directly to C or something more widely
7 matches
Mail list logo