On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
IIRC, historicaly Git allowed some weirdly named refs which made some
commands
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
IIRC, historicaly Git allowed some weirdly named refs which made some
commands ambiguous (e.g. a branch named after an option like '-d').
We're forbidding their
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
Solving this doesn't seem much harder than
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 6c0189f..a4df287 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1117,7
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
I'm not sure what's the convention, but I think the test description
should give
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
I'm not sure what's the convention,
Re-sending this as it wasn't sent as plain text and failed.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
@@ -458,7 +345,7 @@ static void add_verbose_info(struct strbuf *out, struct
ref_array_item *item,
}
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
I'm not sure what's the convention, but I think the test description
should give the expected behavior even with test_expect_failure.
And please help the reviewers
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
- qsort(array.items, index, sizeof(struct ref_array_item *), ref_cmp);
+ if (!sorting) {
+ def_sorting.next = NULL;
+
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy
matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
I'm not sure what's the convention, but I think the test description
should give the expected behavior even with test_expect_failure.
And please help the reviewers by saying what's the status wrt this test
(any
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
Make 'branch.c' use 'ref-filter' APIs for iterating through refs
sorting. This removes most of the code used in 'branch.c' replacing it
with calls to the 'ref-filter' library.
Make 'tag.c' use the 'filter_refs()'
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/git-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
index a67138a..897cd81 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-branch.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
'git branch'
Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com writes:
@@ -458,7 +345,7 @@ static void add_verbose_info(struct strbuf *out, struct
ref_array_item *item,
}
if (item-kind == REF_LOCAL_BRANCH)
- fill_tracking_info(stat, item-refname, filter-verbose 1);
+
Make 'branch.c' use 'ref-filter' APIs for iterating through refs
sorting. This removes most of the code used in 'branch.c' replacing it
with calls to the 'ref-filter' library.
Make 'tag.c' use the 'filter_refs()' function provided by 'ref-filter'
to filter out tags based on the options set.
We
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Christian Couder
christian.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/git-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
index a67138a..897cd81 100644
---
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Karthik Nayak karthik@gmail.com wrote:
Make 'branch.c' use 'ref-filter' APIs for iterating through refs
sorting. This removes most of the code used in 'branch.c' replacing it
with
15 matches
Mail list logo
