On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:07:02PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Yubin Ruan writes:
>
> > That would be helpful. But, frankly, if a user would be aware of that
> > `advice.*'
> > variable, he would have enough knowledge of Git to be aware of that
> > situation.
> > So, I think that 'M lala.txt
Yubin Ruan writes:
> That would be helpful. But, frankly, if a user would be aware of that
> `advice.*'
> variable, he would have enough knowledge of Git to be aware of that situation.
> So, I think that 'M lala.txt' in transitions from branch to branch would be
> sufficient.
Ah, you got the ad
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:19:58PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > But to help "some users are not aware of this" situation, an opt-in
> > "feature" would not help all that much. The same number of lines in
> > the documentation to tell end-users how to toggle on such
Junio C Hamano writes:
> But to help "some users are not aware of this" situation, an opt-in
> "feature" would not help all that much. The same number of lines in
> the documentation to tell end-users how to toggle on such a "safety"
> feature can be spent to teach them that their local changes
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 12:41:03PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Yubin Ruan writes:
>
> > I understand this. I just suggest that git add some warning in case some
> > users
> > are not aware of this, as it does when , on branch 'issue', changes to
> > 'lala.txt'
> > are based on a commit diffe
Yubin Ruan writes:
> I understand this. I just suggest that git add some warning in case some users
> are not aware of this, as it does when , on branch 'issue', changes to
> 'lala.txt'
> are based on a commit different from where the checkout happened, i.e.
>
> on branch 'master'
>
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 12:05:31PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Yubin Ruan writes:
>
> > I think it would be better if git can warn use if we switch to another
> > branch
> > without committing the modification. Git will warn if the modification is
> > based
> > on a commit different from whe
Yubin Ruan writes:
> I think it would be better if git can warn use if we switch to another branch
> without committing the modification. Git will warn if the modification is
> based
> on a commit different from where the checkout happened.
>
> For example, say I am now on branch 'master' and al
Hi,
I think it would be better if git can warn use if we switch to another branch
without committing the modification. Git will warn if the modification is based
on a commit different from where the checkout happened.
For example, say I am now on branch 'master' and all files *clean*. Now if I do:
9 matches
Mail list logo
