On 10/17, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > Since you were asking :) With the introduction of 'git stash push',
> > my hope was always that we could eventually get rid of 'git stash
> > save' and only keep one interface around.
> >
> > As
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Since you were asking :) With the introduction of 'git stash push',
> my hope was always that we could eventually get rid of 'git stash
> save' and only keep one interface around.
>
> As there still many references to it around
On 10/12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > Thomas Gummerer writes:
> >
> >> git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we
> >> are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better
> >> to
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
>> git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we
>> are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better
>> to point new users of git stash to the more modern
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we
> are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better
> to point new users of git stash to the more modern (and more feature
> rich) interface, instead of
On 10/04, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not object with such a well designed deprecation plan for any
> other features, if there are other "favourite" ones people would
> want to deprecate and eventually remove, by the way.
Since you were asking :) With the introduction of 'git stash push',
my
6 matches
Mail list logo