Re: [RFC] deprecate git stash save? (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] http-push: fix construction of hex value from path)

2017-10-17 Thread Thomas Gummerer
On 10/17, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > > > Since you were asking :) With the introduction of 'git stash push', > > my hope was always that we could eventually get rid of 'git stash > > save' and only keep one interface around. > > > > As

Re: [RFC] deprecate git stash save? (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] http-push: fix construction of hex value from path)

2017-10-16 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > Since you were asking :) With the introduction of 'git stash push', > my hope was always that we could eventually get rid of 'git stash > save' and only keep one interface around. > > As there still many references to it around

Re: [RFC] deprecate git stash save?

2017-10-16 Thread Thomas Gummerer
On 10/12, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > Thomas Gummerer writes: > > > >> git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we > >> are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better > >> to

Re: [RFC] deprecate git stash save?

2017-10-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Thomas Gummerer writes: > >> git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we >> are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better >> to point new users of git stash to the more modern

Re: [RFC] deprecate git stash save?

2017-10-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Gummerer writes: > git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we > are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better > to point new users of git stash to the more modern (and more feature > rich) interface, instead of

[RFC] deprecate git stash save? (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] http-push: fix construction of hex value from path)

2017-10-05 Thread Thomas Gummerer
On 10/04, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I do not object with such a well designed deprecation plan for any > other features, if there are other "favourite" ones people would > want to deprecate and eventually remove, by the way. Since you were asking :) With the introduction of 'git stash push', my