Am 28.03.2014 18:10, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 05:57:50PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 04:58, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:52:55PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
No the remote branch is in the upstream subproject. I suppose I meant
“the
Am 28.03.2014 04:36, schrieb W. Trevor King:
gitmodule(5) mentioned 'master' as the default remote branch, but
folks using checkout-style updates are unlikely to care which upstream
branch their commit comes from (they only care that the clone fetches
that commit). If they haven't set
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:35:07PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 04:36, schrieb W. Trevor King:
The main drawback to this approach is that we're changing a default,
but I agree with John's:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:21:23AM +0100, Johan Herland wrote:
I expect in most cases
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
I'd prefer a solution that doesn't change any defaults for the
checkout use case (again). Maybe it is a better route to revert
this series, then add tests describing the current behavior for
checkout submodules as a next step before adding the branch
Am 28.03.2014 04:58, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:52:55PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:43:47PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
submodule.name.branch::
A remote branch
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 05:57:50PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 04:58, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:52:55PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
No the remote branch is in the upstream subproject. I suppose I meant
“the submodule's remote-tracking branch following
Jens Lehmann jens.lehm...@web.de writes:
Am 28.03.2014 04:58, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:52:55PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:43:47PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
gitmodule(5) mentioned 'master' as the default remote branch, but
folks using checkout-style updates are unlikely to care which upstream
branch their commit comes from (they only care that the clone fetches
that commit). If they haven't set submodule.name.branch, it makes
more sense to mirror
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
gitmodule(5) mentioned 'master' as the default remote branch, but
folks using checkout-style updates are unlikely to care which upstream
branch their commit comes from (they only care that the clone fetches
that commit).
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:43:47PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
submodule.name.branch::
A remote branch name for tracking updates in the upstream submodule.
- If the option is not specified, it defaults
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:52:55PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:43:47PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
submodule.name.branch::
A remote branch name for tracking updates in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
