Jonathan Tan writes:
>> I am not sure if this "at the conclusion of" is sensible. It is OK
>> to assume that what the client side has is fixed, and it is probably
>> OK to desire that what the server side has can change, but at the
>> same time, it feels quite fragile
On 01/26/2017 02:23 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jonathan Tan writes:
Currently, while performing packfile negotiation [1], upload-pack allows
clients to specify their desired objects only as SHA-1s. This causes:
(a) vulnerability to failure when an object turns
Jonathan Tan writes:
> Currently, while performing packfile negotiation [1], upload-pack allows
> clients to specify their desired objects only as SHA-1s. This causes:
> (a) vulnerability to failure when an object turns non-existent during
> negotiation, which may
Currently, while performing packfile negotiation [1], upload-pack allows
clients to specify their desired objects only as SHA-1s. This causes:
(a) vulnerability to failure when an object turns non-existent during
negotiation, which may happen if, for example, upload-pack is
provided by
4 matches
Mail list logo