Re: [RFC PATCH] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> While we already have a porcelain2 layer for git-status, that is accurate >> for submodules, users still like the way they are are used to of >> 'status -s'. >> >> As a

Re: [RFC PATCH] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes

Stefan Beller writes: > While we already have a porcelain2 layer for git-status, that is accurate > for submodules, users still like the way they are are used to of > 'status -s'. > > As a submodule has more state than a file potentially, we'll look at all > cases: > >

[RFC PATCH] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes

While we already have a porcelain2 layer for git-status, that is accurate for submodules, users still like the way they are are used to of 'status -s'. As a submodule has more state than a file potentially, we'll look at all cases: -- new submodule commits / - modified files | /