Wink Saville writes:
> Currently I'm not rebasing the other commits (3..9)
> to reduce the amount of work I have to do in each
> review cycle, is that OK?
Yeah, I want to see others more heavily involved in this part of the
system to comment on your patches. As to the
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Wink Saville writes:
>
>> At Junio's suggestion have git-rebase--am and git-rebase--merge work the
>> same way as git-rebase--interactive. This makes the code more consistent.
>
> I mumbled about making
Wink Saville writes:
> At Junio's suggestion have git-rebase--am and git-rebase--merge work the
> same way as git-rebase--interactive. This makes the code more consistent.
I mumbled about making git_rebase__$type functions for all $type in
my previous response, but that was
At Junio's suggestion have git-rebase--am and git-rebase--merge work the
same way as git-rebase--interactive. This makes the code more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Wink Saville
---
git-rebase--am.sh | 17 ++---
git-rebase--interactive.sh | 8 +++-
4 matches
Mail list logo