Am 08.02.2013 21:17, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
BTW, Is there a better way to clean out the worktree than `git rm -rf
.`, since that fails for submodules? The impulsive `reset --hard`
obviously fails because there is no HEAD.
I _think_ the git
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Why should I have to `git rm -rf .` after a `git checkout --orphan`?
What sort of misfeature/ incomplete feature is this?
One designed for the going open source use case, where you have
existing code that you want to put into a new branch without history.
When there
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
BTW, Is there a better way to clean out the worktree than `git rm -rf
.`, since that fails for submodules? The impulsive `reset --hard`
obviously fails because there is no HEAD.
I _think_ the git rm is one of the things on Jens's roadmap. Also
I'm curious what your use case is.
The behavior has been inconvenient for me too, but I have only used it
in test cases; I have no real use case where I wanted to create an
unborn/orphan branch.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why should I
4 matches
Mail list logo