On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 8/5/2013 16:23, schrieb Duy Nguyen:
>> close() is added in commit_lock_file(), before rename(), by 4723ee9
>> (Close files opened by lock_file() before unlinking. - 2007-11-13),
>> which is needed by Windows. But doesn't that create a gap b
Am 8/5/2013 16:23, schrieb Duy Nguyen:
> close() is added in commit_lock_file(), before rename(), by 4723ee9
> (Close files opened by lock_file() before unlinking. - 2007-11-13),
> which is needed by Windows. But doesn't that create a gap between
> close() and rename() on other platforms where anot
Duy Nguyen writes:
> close() is added in commit_lock_file(), before rename(), by 4723ee9
> (Close files opened by lock_file() before unlinking. - 2007-11-13),
> which is needed by Windows. But doesn't that create a gap between
> close() and rename() on other platforms where another process can
>
close() is added in commit_lock_file(), before rename(), by 4723ee9
(Close files opened by lock_file() before unlinking. - 2007-11-13),
which is needed by Windows. But doesn't that create a gap between
close() and rename() on other platforms where another process can
replace .lock file with somethi
4 matches
Mail list logo