Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Dimitar Bonev dsbo...@gmail.com writes:
[administrivia: please do not drop people out of Cc list]
That invites another question: if it is very well related, why isn't
it an option to start from the state you have in the working tree
(i.e. doing
Dimitar Bonev dsbo...@gmail.com writes:
One more argument against the suggestion of doing a commit ahead of
time is that I like to think in separation to reduce complexity - in
particular I like to think only for the working dir and index states,
commits - I treat them as finished work. If I
Dimitar Bonev dsbo...@gmail.com writes:
[administrivia: please do not drop people out of Cc list]
Actually this is not the case as I tried to explain with the 'git
commit' followed by 'git checkout HEAD~1 -- targetfile' followed by
'git commit --amend' example. The index and the working dir
Hi,
I have been looking for such a command/option and no one gave me
sufficient answer. So this message should be considered as a feature
request. I had a situation where I had staged a file with a problem
solution in it, then I wanted to experiment with a different solution
so I had to revert
Dimitar Bonev dsbo...@gmail.com writes:
I have been looking for such a command/option and no one gave me
sufficient answer. So this message should be considered as a feature
request. I had a situation where I had staged a file with a problem
solution in it, then I wanted to experiment with a
I think if there was such a command, it could well be common, at least
for me. I am somewhat surprised that from the three combinations of
resetting index and working dir's states of a file this is the one
that is missing (it is missing at commit level also for what is
worth). Summary table of
Dimitar Bonev wrote:
@ThomasRast: 'git show HEAD:targetfile targetfile' was proposed in
the both links that I provided in the email that your replied to, but
this introduces external dependency to the command interpreter to
output the file unmodified but not every interpreter does this.
Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch writes:
I have been looking for such a command/option and no one gave me
sufficient answer. So this message should be considered as a feature
request. I had a situation where I had staged a file with a problem
solution in it, then I wanted to experiment with a
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I have something worth saving, better than HEAD in some way
(e.g. contains fixes), in my index. I want to keep it while I
experiment an approach that is unrelated to it, so I want a clean
slate in the working tree from HEAD without disturbing the
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there no way to convince PowerShell to treat the output of a
command as binary data with no particular encoding?
The best I could find out is to pipe the output to set-content:
git show HEAD:targetfile | set-content
10 matches
Mail list logo
