Re: Adding RFC 3161 timestamps to git tags

Michael J Gruber writes: > Anton Wuerfel venit, vidit, dixit 07.03.2016 15:15: >> Hello, >> >> as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp >> signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify >> cryptographic time stamp

Re: Adding RFC 3161 timestamps to git tags

Anton Wuerfel venit, vidit, dixit 07.03.2016 15:15: > Hello, > > as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp > signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify > cryptographic time stamp signatures to prove that a commit existed at a > certain point

Re: Adding RFC 3161 timestamps to git tags

Hello Junio, thanks for your reply. See my comments below. "Junio C Hamano" writes: > A few random thoughts that come to mind, none of which is > rhetorical [*1*]: > > - What should happen when the timestamping service is unreachable? >The user cannot get her work done

Re: Adding RFC 3161 timestamps to git tags

"Anton Wuerfel" writes: > as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp > signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify > cryptographic time stamp signatures to prove that a commit existed at a > certain point in time. > > As a

Adding RFC 3161 timestamps to git tags

Hello, as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify cryptographic time stamp signatures to prove that a commit existed at a certain point in time. As a long-term goal, we would like to get this new