On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
NAME
git-rebase - Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head
=
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
NAME
git-rebase - Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head
= Quite technical already.
Very much true, and I would say the description is
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Perhaps something like this instead?
git-rebase - Rebuild a branch on top of a different commit
I would say Replay history on top of a different commit instead.
Rebuild may be misleading (it's
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Perhaps something like this instead?
git-rebase - Rebuild a branch on top of a different commit
I would say Replay history on top of a different commit instead.
Rebuild may be misleading (it's not build as in compile link),
and the rebased history
Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com writes:
Obviously my page as it is now is very different in tone from the
git-rebase page, but I think there are some aspects that could be
fruitfully merged. Would you be interested in patches of this sort,
or does the page seem too far from the
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
NAME
git-rebase - Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head
= Quite technical already.
Very much true, and I would say the description is technically
correct in the sense that it is not wrong per-se. There are a
few
Hi,
Sorry for the rather open-ended email, but I am interested to whether
you would be interested in patches for git-rebase man page, based on a
tutorial page I wrote some ago:
http://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/rebase_without_tears.html
The reason I ask, is because I have found the
7 matches
Mail list logo
