On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o writes:
>
>> So Junio owns the pub/scm/git/git.git tree on kernel.org, and he may
>> already have access to create new repo's under the pub/scm/git
>> hierarchy. In which case we might not
Theodore Ts'o writes:
> So Junio owns the pub/scm/git/git.git tree on kernel.org, and he may
> already have access to create new repo's under the pub/scm/git
> hierarchy. In which case we might not need to bug the kernel.org
> administrators at all.
Yes, sorry for a premature
So Junio owns the pub/scm/git/git.git tree on kernel.org, and he may
already have access to create new repo's under the pub/scm/git
hierarchy. In which case we might not need to bug the kernel.org
administrators at all.
Also, I'll note that it is possible to set up some repo's such that a
group
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> The Git community considers using submodules for some parts of the
> code (a third party lib, SHA1DC, computing SHA1s that warn about
> potential attachs, see shattered.io) [1].
>
> We are also concerned about single
Hi,
The Git community considers using submodules for some parts of the
code (a third party lib, SHA1DC, computing SHA1s that warn about
potential attachs, see shattered.io) [1].
We are also concerned about single point of failure there, so a repo
at kernel.org
mirroring the potential
5 matches
Mail list logo