Antw: Re: bug deleting "unmerged" branch (2.12.3)

Hi Philip! I'm unsure what you are asking for... Ulrich >>> "Philip Oakley" 04.12.17 0.30 Uhr >>> From: "Junio C Hamano" > "Philip Oakley" writes: > >> I think it was that currently you are on M, and neither A nor B are >>

Re: Antw: Re: bug deleting "unmerged" branch (2.12.3)

Hi Ulrich From: "Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> To: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:27 PM Subject: Re: Antw: Re: bug deleting "unmerged" br

Re: Antw: Re: bug deleting "unmerged" branch (2.12.3)

Hi Ulrich, On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > >> During a rebase that turned out to be heavier than expected 8-( I > >> decided to keep the old branch by creating a temporary branch name to > >> the commit of the branch to rebase (which

Antw: Re: bug deleting "unmerged" branch (2.12.3)

> "Ulrich Windl" writes: > >> I think if more than one branches are pointing to the same commit, >> one should be allowed to delete all but the last one without >> warning. Do you agree? > > That comes from a viewpoint that the only purpose "branch -d" exists

Antw: Re: bug deleting "unmerged" branch (2.12.3)

> Hi Ulrich, > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >> During a rebase that turned out to be heavier than expected 8-( I >> decided to keep the old branch by creating a temporary branch name to >> the commit of the branch to rebase (which was still the old commit ID at >> that time).