Re: Bug with automated processing of git status results

2017-06-30 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 30/06/17 11:09, Matthieu Moy wrote: Сергей Шестаков writes: I understand that we can turn off core.safecrlf, but it's inconvinient. Note that you can do that without actually changing the config file: git -c core.safecrlf=false status ... Beside that, I

Re: Bug with automated processing of git status results

2017-06-30 Thread Matthieu Moy
Сергей Шестаков writes: > I understand that we can turn off core.safecrlf, but it's > inconvinient. Note that you can do that without actually changing the config file: git -c core.safecrlf=false status ... -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

Re: Bug with automated processing of git status results

2017-06-30 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:00:14AM +0300, Сергей Шестаков wrote: > I am trying to make an automated processing of "git status" results. > I execute the command > > git status -z -uno > > I expect that it has stable output format. However, it still can print > warnings like > > warning: CRLF

Bug with automated processing of git status results

2017-06-30 Thread Сергей Шестаков
Hi! I am trying to make an automated processing of "git status" results. I execute the command git status -z -uno I expect that it has stable output format. However, it still can print warnings like warning: CRLF will be replaced by LF in somefile.xml I understand that we can turn off