Clarification on the git+ssh and ssh+git schemes

2016-02-05 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
Hello gits, git supports using git+ssh:// and ssh+git:// instead of ssh:// or the rsync-style format. The first two are however not documented in the git-clone manage as acceptable protocols (which is what I think of as the canonical source for what you can use). There are tests to make sure

Re: Clarification on the git+ssh and ssh+git schemes

2016-02-05 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:33:06AM -0800, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote: > git supports using git+ssh:// and ssh+git:// instead of ssh:// or the > rsync-style format. The first two are however not documented in the > git-clone manage as acceptable protocols (which is what I think of as > the

Re: Clarification on the git+ssh and ssh+git schemes

2016-02-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jeff King wrote: > > I suspect they were not really documented because nobody wanted to > encourage their use. I don't think it would be wrong to document that > they exist and are deprecated, though. They exist because some people seemed to think

Re: Clarification on the git+ssh and ssh+git schemes

2016-02-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Linus Torvalds writes: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jeff King wrote: >> >> I suspect they were not really documented because nobody wanted to >> encourage their use. I don't think it would be wrong to document that >> they exist and are

Re: Clarification on the git+ssh and ssh+git schemes

2016-02-05 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
> On 05 Feb 2016, at 14:11, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Linus Torvalds writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jeff King wrote: >>> >>> I suspect they were not really documented because nobody wanted to >>> encourage their