Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Thanks, the new text looks good to me. Please follow SubmittingPatches
(notably, you need to sign-off your work, and please send patches inline
rather than as attachments).
Ah, didn't see
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Thanks, the new text looks good to me. Please follow SubmittingPatches
(notably, you need to sign-off your work, and
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:31:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
-- 8 --
From: Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:07:08 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] config.txt: third-party tools may and do use their own
variables
[...]
+Other git-related tools may and do use their own
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:31:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
-- 8 --
From: Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:07:08 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] config.txt: third-party tools may and do use their own
variables
[...]
+Other git-related
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
[1] Is there a word to mean the pluralness of a noun or verb (similar
to tense for a verb).
I've seen plural vs singular often mentioned in the context of
subject and verb agreement.
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/concord talks about agreement in gender,
number,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Two parts to the question, then. Firstly, is it acceptable to use 'git
config' for a hook like this? And secondly, either: Is there a naming
convention to follow? or, what alternative would you recommend?
1. I would say
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Kevin i...@ikke.info wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Two parts to the question, then. Firstly, is it acceptable to use 'git
config' for a hook like this? And secondly, either: Is there a naming
convention to
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
file. It doesn't really care about the full history, and wants to be
reasonably fast (as the user is waiting for it). It's just a
convenience, so correctness isn't a huge issue. The easiest way to
keep it moving through quickly is to limit the search:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
file. It doesn't really care about the full history, and wants to be
reasonably fast (as the user is waiting for it). It's just a
convenience, so correctness isn't a huge issue.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:51:16AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
1. I would say yes. git config is made to be extended and doesn't
require a config item to be known.
2. Namespacing the config items like you did is a good thing to do so
it won't interfere with other options.
Excellent!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:46:15AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
oohh. Heh. I thought the porcelain sections of git were the
lower-level or machine-readable versions of other tools, and didn't
really think of mine as fitting into that.
The term sometimes gets used confusingly. The
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Thanks, the new text looks good to me. Please follow SubmittingPatches
(notably, you need to sign-off your work, and please send patches inline
rather than as attachments).
Ah, didn't see that file.
From
I have a bit of a weird question. Poking around with Google searches
hasn't come up with any results, so I'm asking here :)
Short version: What's the most appropriate way to configure a git hook?
Long version: I have a git hook (handles prepare-commit-msg and
commit-msg) and part of what it does
13 matches
Mail list logo
