Junio C Hamano writes:
> Your suggesting to mention that particular message hints at me that
> you feel that the users may not necessarily understand that push did
> not result in any update of references on the other side when they
> see it. If the message was clear enough to them, "when it rea
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 10:14 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Your suggesting to mention that particular message hints at me that
> you feel that the users may not necessarily understand that push did
> not result in any update of references on the other side when they
> see it. If the message was cl
Christoph Michelbach writes:
> On November 20, 2017 2:17:58 AM GMT+01:00,
>>How about this rewrite? Would it consider all the points raised and
>>make it easier to understand?
>>
>>This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' when it reacts to
>>'git push' and updates reference(s) in its
On November 20, 2017 2:17:58 AM GMT+01:00,
>How about this rewrite? Would it consider all the points raised and
>make it easier to understand?
>
>This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' when it reacts to
>'git push' and updates reference(s) in its repository.
I think it's much more
Christoph Michelbach writes:
> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> So an updated suggestion for the text would be:
>>
>> This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' on the remote repository,
>> which happens when a 'git push' is done on a local repository.
>>
>>
On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 12:42 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Christoph Michelbach wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > >
> > > So an updated suggestion for the text would be:
> > >
> > > This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pa
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Christoph Michelbach wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > So an updated suggestion for the text would be:
> >
> > This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' on the remote repository,
> > which happens when a 'git push' is done on a l
On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:24 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> So an updated suggestion for the text would be:
>
> This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' on the remote repository,
> which happens when a 'git push' is done on a local repository.
>
> Oh, wait. That is what we already hav
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' on the remote repository,
>> which happens when a 'git push' is done on a local repository and
>> successfully transfers at least 1 commit.
>
> I am not sure "at least 1 commit" is a good phrase to use here.
> There
Christoph Michelbach writes:
> I think the documentation of the post-receive hook is misleading. When reading
> it, it appears as though the post-receive hook is executed even when no
> commits
> are transferred by a git push because it isn't mentioned anywhere that this is
> necessary for its e
Hi,
I think the documentation of the post-receive hook is misleading. When reading
it, it appears as though the post-receive hook is executed even when no commits
are transferred by a git push because it isn't mentioned anywhere that this is
necessary for its execution.
This can easily be fixed b
11 matches
Mail list logo
