W dniu 20.01.2017 o 01:26, Linus Torvalds pisze:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>> W dniu 19.01.2017 o 19:39, Linus Torvalds pisze:
>>>
>>> You can do it in tig, but I suspect a more graphical tool might be better.
>>
>> Well, we do have "git gui
Hi Stefan,
Às 10:03 PM de 1/19/2017, Stefan Beller escreveu:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>> Às 7:16 PM de 1/19/2017, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Joao Pinto
>>> wrote:
I am
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 19.01.2017 o 19:39, Linus Torvalds pisze:
>>
>> You can do it in tig, but I suspect a more graphical tool might be better.
>
> Well, we do have "git gui blame".
Does that actually work for people? Because it really
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Joao Pinto wrote:
> Às 7:16 PM de 1/19/2017, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>>>
>>> I am currently facing some challenges in one of Linux subsystems where a
>>>
Às 7:16 PM de 1/19/2017, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>>
>> I am currently facing some challenges in one of Linux subsystems where a
>> rename
>> of a set of folders and files would be the perfect scenario for future
>>
W dniu 19.01.2017 o 19:39, Linus Torvalds pisze:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
> wrote:
>>
>> Still, I welcome you to read the sort-of "reference" post by Linus
>> Torvalds [1] in which he explains the reasoning behind this approach
>> implemented
Hi Linus,
Às 6:39 PM de 1/19/2017, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
> wrote:
>>
>> Still, I welcome you to read the sort-of "reference" post by Linus
>> Torvalds [1] in which he explains the reasoning behind this approach
>>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>
> I am currently facing some challenges in one of Linux subsystems where a
> rename
> of a set of folders and files would be the perfect scenario for future
> development, but the suggestion is not accepted, not
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
>
> Still, I welcome you to read the sort-of "reference" post by Linus
> Torvalds [1] in which he explains the reasoning behind this approach
> implemented in Git.
It's worth noting that that discussion was from
Hi,
Às 6:33 AM de 1/19/2017, Konstantin Khomoutov escreveu:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:40:52 +
> Joao Pinto wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I have seen a lot of Linux developers avoid this re-organization
>> operations because they would lose the renamed file history, because
>>
Konstantin Khomoutov writes:
> Still, I welcome you to read the sort-of "reference" post by Linus
> Torvalds [1] in which he explains the reasoning behind this approach
> implemented in Git. IMO, understanding the reasoning behind the idea
> is much better than just
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:40:52 +
Joao Pinto wrote:
[...]
> I have seen a lot of Linux developers avoid this re-organization
> operations because they would lose the renamed file history, because
> a new log is created for the new file, even if it is a renamed
> version
Hi Stefan,
Às 6:50 PM de 1/18/2017, Stefan Beller escreveu:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My name is Joao Pinto, I work at Synopsys and I am a frequent Linux Kernel
>> contributor.
>>
>> Let me start by congratulate you for the
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Joao Pinto, I work at Synopsys and I am a frequent Linux Kernel
> contributor.
>
> Let me start by congratulate you for the fantastic work you have been doing
> with
> Git which is an excellent
Hello,
My name is Joao Pinto, I work at Synopsys and I am a frequent Linux Kernel
contributor.
Let me start by congratulate you for the fantastic work you have been doing with
Git which is an excellent tool.
The Linux Kernel as all systems needs to be improved and re-organized to be
better
15 matches
Mail list logo