On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 06:41:38PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> - we should avoid anyone who is affiliated with a company that already
>has a member on the committee. So nobody from Google and nobody from
>GitHub. I would extend that to Microsoft, too, given a certain
>impending
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> So here are the nominations I came up with. If you'd like to nominate
> somebody else (or yourself!), please do. If you have opinions, let me
> know (public or private, as you prefer).
>
> - Christian Couder
> - Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Thu, Aug 16 2018, Jeff King wrote:
> - Christian Couder
> - Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Thanks for the nomination. I'm happy to help the project by serving on
the leadership committee if you'll have me.
> Both are active, have been around a long time, and have taken part in
> non-code
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 07:32:38PM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 3:43 PM Jeff King wrote:
> > - we should avoid anyone who is affiliated with a company that already
> >has a member on the committee. So nobody from Google and nobody from
> >GitHub. I would extend
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 3:43 PM Jeff King wrote:
> - we should avoid anyone who is affiliated with a company that already
>has a member on the committee. So nobody from Google and nobody from
>GitHub. I would extend that to Microsoft, too, given a certain
>impending acquisition. I'd
Jeff King writes:
> Here are _my_ opinions on how we should fill the role
> ...
> So here are the nominations I came up with. If you'd like to nominate
> somebody else (or yourself!), please do. If you have opinions, let me
> know (public or private, as you prefer).
>
> - Christian Couder
>
This is a followup to the issue I raised back in March[1], which is
that our project committee at Software Freedom Conservancy has two
members, but is required by the charter to have at least three.
There wasn't any substantive discussion in response to that email or at
the contributor summit. I
7 matches
Mail list logo