Re: How to `git status' without scrambling modified with new, etc

Samuel Lijin writes: > You can use `git status -s` and match on the modification type (M > corresponds to modified, A to new files). See the man page for more > details on the interface. ahh yes. Just the ticket thanks

Re: How to `git status' without scrambling modified with new, etc

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> This is probably what everyone sees: >> >> When I run `git status'; I see modified and newfiles scrambled together >> >> Is there a trick

Re: How to `git status' without scrambling modified with new, etc

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > This is probably what everyone sees: > > When I run `git status'; I see modified and newfiles scrambled together > > Is there a trick or technique to make that output show each category > separately? > > Or do folks just a

How to `git status' without scrambling modified with new, etc

This is probably what everyone sees: When I run `git status'; I see modified and newfiles scrambled together Is there a trick or technique to make that output show each category separately? Or do folks just a throw a `sort' in there (git status|sort) and lose the color ouput?