Hi Michael,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
> Hi Stephan!
>
> On 06/19/2016 07:01 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Any other ways to do what I want without creating a separate forked
>>> repo for each of the su
Hi Stephan!
On 06/19/2016 07:01 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
Any other ways to do what I want without creating a separate forked
repo for each of the sub-projects? Or have I misunderstood one of
these schemes?
I think forking is the way to
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
>
> Any other ways to do what I want without creating a separate forked
> repo for each of the sub-projects? Or have I misunderstood one of
> these schemes?
I think forking is the way to go here, as you want to have new code
and maintain that
I'm trying to create a git repository for a tool chain for a proprietary
processor. I'd like to create a private repo with documentation, build
scripts, etc., which includes several sub-projects: binutils, gcc, newlib,
etc. Each of the sub-projects will have a branch which has support for
the ne
4 matches
Mail list logo
