Re: Obsolete instruction in SubmittingPatches?

Andrei Rybak writes: > On 01.03.2018 0:54, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Andrei Rybak writes: >> >>> Is this part of guidelines obsolete, or am I not understanding this >>> correctly? >> >> I am merely being nice (but only on "time-permitting" basis). > >

Re: Obsolete instruction in SubmittingPatches?

On 01.03.2018 0:54, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andrei Rybak writes: > >> Is this part of guidelines obsolete, or am I not understanding this >> correctly? > > I am merely being nice (but only on "time-permitting" basis). > Does that mean that the integration of a series is

Re: Obsolete instruction in SubmittingPatches?

Andrei Rybak writes: > Is this part of guidelines obsolete, or am I not understanding this > correctly? I am merely being nice (but only on "time-permitting" basis).

Obsolete instruction in SubmittingPatches?

Hello, It seems to me that this part of Documentation/SubmittingPatches is not actual nowadays: After the list reached a consensus that it is a good idea to apply the patch, re-send it with "To:" set to the maintainer{1} and "cc:" the list{2} for inclusion. >From what I observe in the