On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 09:50:50AM +0200, St. Blind wrote:
> In order to make some analyses here I had to build certain report
> lists of our remote refs, based on various "containing" and "merged"
> rules. We have more than hundred such refs at a time usually. So my
> poor script which tries to m
St. Blind gmail.com> writes:
>
> The > git-branch --contains and --merged are not very handy too,
> because the> output is not really flexible, and the --merged works
> on HEAD only.
>
`git branch --merged foo` will list branches that are merged in the history
of 'foo'. And the equivalent is
Hi.
In order to make some analyses here I had to build certain report
lists of our remote refs, based on various "containing" and "merged"
rules. We have more than hundred such refs at a time usually. So my
poor script which tries to make decisions with the help of rev-list
for each ref on each ar
3 matches
Mail list logo
