On January 15, 2018 10:01 PM, brian m. Carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:25:37AM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> > On January 15, 2018 2:06 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > > I take "die exits with non-zero" as a piece of information for the
> > > *users* so that they can write "if perl foo
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:25:37AM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> On January 15, 2018 2:06 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > I take "die exits with non-zero" as a piece of information for the
> > *users* so that they can write "if perl foo.pl; then something; fi" in shell
> > scripts. I do *not* inte
On January 15, 2018 2:06 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 15.01.2018 um 03:37 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
> > On January 14, 2018 4:33 PM, I wrote:
> >> The exotic error code coming back from perl is 162. I can muck with
> >> it, if there was a value more useful to git.
> >> * 553 } else if (
Am 15.01.2018 um 03:37 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
On January 14, 2018 4:33 PM, I wrote:
The exotic error code coming back from perl is 162. I can muck with it, if
there was a value more useful to git.
* 553 } else if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
* 554 code = WEXITSTATUS(stat
On January 14, 2018 4:33 PM, I wrote:
> On January 14, 2018 1:41 PM Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > Sent: > > Am 14.01.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
> > > Follow-up: This looks like the completion code from perl on NonStop
> > > is not the same as expected by git in the case of failures. I need
> -Original Message-
> From: Johannes Sixt [mailto:j...@kdbg.org]
> Sent: On January 14, 2018 1:41 PM wrote:
> Am 14.01.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
> > Follow-up: This looks like the completion code from perl on NonStop is
> > not the same as expected by git in the case of fail
Am 14.01.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
Follow-up: This looks like the completion code from perl on NonStop is not
the same as expected by git in the case of failures. I need to debug this to
get more details to the team. We have had completion issues before relating
to interpretation p
On January 13, 2018 3:17 PM, I wrote:
> On January 13, 2018 2:31 PM, I wrote:
> > On January 13, 2018 1:08 PM, I wrote:
> > > Heres where things are. This is probably the best git release so
> > > far
> > (ever).
> > > After applying a4cdf02, I had 6 total breakages. 3 existing, 3 new.
> > > Many
8 matches
Mail list logo