Jeff King writes:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:23:50AM +, Kevin Willford wrote:
>
>> > This read_cache_from() should be a noop, right, because it immediately
>> > sees istate->initialized is set? So it shouldn't matter that it is not
>> > in the conditional with discard_cache(). Though if its
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:23:50AM +, Kevin Willford wrote:
> > This read_cache_from() should be a noop, right, because it immediately
> > sees istate->initialized is set? So it shouldn't matter that it is not
> > in the conditional with discard_cache(). Though if its only purpose is
> > to re
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 03:54:25PM -0600, Kevin Willford wrote:
>
> > If there is not a pre-commit hook, there is no reason to discard
> > the index and reread it.
> >
> > This change checks to presence of a pre-commit hook and then only
> > discards the index if there was one.
> >
> > Signed-of
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 03:54:25PM -0600, Kevin Willford wrote:
> If there is not a pre-commit hook, there is no reason to discard
> the index and reread it.
>
> This change checks to presence of a pre-commit hook and then only
> discards the index if there was one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Will
4 matches
Mail list logo