> -Original Message-
> From: Torsten Bögershausen [mailto:tbo...@web.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 10:16 AM
> To: Ben Peart
> Cc: Ben Peart ; Junio C Hamano
> ; david.tur...@twosigma.com; ava...@gmail.com;
>
>
> Should I just make the variable type itself uintmax_t and then just skip
> the cast altogether? I went with uint64_t because that is what
> getnanotime returned.
>
That is a bit of taste question (or answer)
Typically you declare the variables in the type you need,
and this is uint64_t.
> -Original Message-
> From: Torsten Bögershausen [mailto:tbo...@web.de]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 11:43 AM
> To: Ben Peart ; Junio C Hamano
> ; Ben Peart
> Cc: david.tur...@twosigma.com; ava...@gmail.com;
>
On 2017-09-18 15:38, Ben Peart wrote:
>
>
> On 9/17/2017 4:02 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Ben Peart writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c b/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00..482d749bb9
>>> --- /dev/null
On 9/17/2017 4:02 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ben Peart writes:
diff --git a/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c b/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c
new file mode 100644
index 00..482d749bb9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#include
Ben Peart writes:
> diff --git a/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c b/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..482d749bb9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/helper/test-dump-fsmonitor.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +#include "cache.h"
> +
> +int cmd_main(int
6 matches
Mail list logo