On 10/4/2017 2:38 AM, Alex Vandiver wrote:
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Rats indeed. Let's go incremental as promised, perhaps like this
(but please supply a better description if you have one).
I think you'll also want the following squashed into 5c8cdcfd8 and
def437671:
--
On 10/3/2017 10:09 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ben Peart writes:
Well, rats. I found one more issue that applies to two of the
commits. Can you squash this in as well or do you want it in some
other form?
Rats indeed. Let's go incremental as promised, perhaps like this
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Rats indeed. Let's go incremental as promised, perhaps like this
> (but please supply a better description if you have one).
I think you'll also want the following squashed into 5c8cdcfd8 and
def437671:
-- >8 --
>From
Ben Peart writes:
> Well, rats. I found one more issue that applies to two of the
> commits. Can you squash this in as well or do you want it in some
> other form?
Rats indeed. Let's go incremental as promised, perhaps like this
(but please supply a better description if
On 10/1/2017 4:24 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ben Peart writes:
I had accumulated the same set of changes with one addition of removing
a duplicate "the" from a comment in the fsmonitor.h file:
diff --git a/fsmonitor.h b/fsmonitor.h
index 8eb6163455..0de644e01a
Ben Peart writes:
> I had accumulated the same set of changes with one addition of removing
> a duplicate "the" from a comment in the fsmonitor.h file:
>
> diff --git a/fsmonitor.h b/fsmonitor.h
> index 8eb6163455..0de644e01a 100644
> --- a/fsmonitor.h
> +++
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de; pclo...@gmail.com; p...@peff.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] Fast git status via a file system watcher
>
> Ben Peart <benpe...@microsoft.com> writes:
>
> > The only behavioral change from V7 is the removal of unnecessary uses
> > o
Ben Peart writes:
> The only behavioral change from V7 is the removal of unnecessary uses of
> CE_MATCH_IGNORE_FSMONITOR. With a better understanding of *why* the
> CE_MATCH_IGNORE_* flags are used, it is now clear they are not required
> in most cases where
8 matches
Mail list logo