Hi Stefan,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>> (B) sounds like an independent feature, which could go in parallel?
>>
>> B may sound like an independent feature, but it needs a merge
>> algorithm that doesn't mess with the working tree
>
> I agree on that,
>
>> so it
context:
https://public-inbox.org/git/cabpp-bfqjzhfcjz1qvhvvcmd-_sofi0fkm5pexewzzn+zw2...@mail.gmail.com/
Hi Elijah,
>> Most items forward-reference "Depends on () up to here;
>> (H) seems independent, but might be a good first start.
>> (G) [8] is queued as origin/en/merge-recursive-tests, or
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
>> Currently, I would like to:
>>
>> A) Fix cases where directory rename detection does not work with
>>rebase/am due to how they call merge-recursive.
>>
>>Notes:
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have some merge-related plans (and work in progress) that I'd like
> to get some feedback on in order to find what order would be best to
> address things in, if there are special steps I should take while
> approaching
Hi everyone,
I have some merge-related plans (and work in progress) that I'd like
to get some feedback on in order to find what order would be best to
address things in, if there are special steps I should take while
approaching some of the bigger items, and even if folks disagree with
any of the
5 matches
Mail list logo
